Introduction
Summary of the book For a New Liberty by Murray N. Rothbard. Before we start, let’s delve into a short overview of the book. Imagine a world where no single group forces its power over everyone else. A place where people cooperate because they want to, not because they fear punishment by a huge, central authority. This may sound unusual since we are used to government agencies controlling many parts of our lives. But what if life could be simpler, more peaceful, and fairer without a government telling us what to do? Could society actually work smoothly when guided by respect for others and their property, rather than by laws made by distant rulers? The ideas in the following chapters will invite you to imagine such a possibility. They describe what is known as libertarianism – a way of thinking that puts personal freedom at the center. As you read on, you will discover why libertarians dislike government control, how private people can replace public services, and what a freer, more creative future might look like.
Chapter 1: A Mysterious Legacy of Liberty: How Forgotten Ideals Shaped a Radical Political Philosophy.
Long before today’s political debates, there was a time when the idea of liberty stood at the heart of how people imagined government. In olden days, kings ruled with absolute power, placing heavy taxes on their subjects and controlling trade. But eventually, brave thinkers and writers questioned these powerful rulers. They believed everyone deserved personal freedom and the right to keep what they earned. Such thinkers are now known as classical liberals, and their ideas helped shape the United States at its birth. They wanted a world where individuals could follow their dreams without a king or ruler forcing unfair rules upon them. These early seeds of classical liberalism, planted centuries ago, later blossomed into what we call libertarianism – a philosophy dedicated to keeping people free from unnecessary control and allowing them to live as they choose.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, Europe was filled with monarchs who demanded high taxes and often waged endless wars for wealth and glory. People were tired of being treated like pieces on a game board. They hungered for a different kind of life, where peace, trade, and cooperation replaced forced obedience. That is why English philosopher John Locke’s writings were so groundbreaking. Locke argued that every person had natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and if a government disrespected these rights, the people had every reason to stand up and change it. His ideas spread widely, inspiring many to dream of a society guided by fairness and voluntary agreement. Over time, these bold notions influenced thinkers in the American colonies, shaping their revolutionary ideas and sparking their desire for true independence.
When Americans broke away from British rule, they tried to create a nation that respected these personal rights. They read works like Cato’s Letters, written by John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, which attacked the idea of an all-powerful state. The founders believed that a society could be stable and prosperous if individuals directed their own lives. Early America held strong libertarian beliefs: no king to boss everyone around, no forced religion to justify controlling laws, and no absolute rulers allowed to crush personal freedom. But as time passed, these bright ideals dimmed. Power gradually shifted, and the central government grew bigger and more controlling. What was once a mainstream belief – that people deserved wide freedoms – began to slip into the background as new political parties and ideologies took center stage.
By the 19th century, waves of change left the original ideals behind. The Democratic Party once seemed to stand for freedom, but the bitter fight over slavery and the rise of new political forces disturbed this balance. Meanwhile, the Republican Party, although ending slavery, introduced many big government policies. Businesses received special treatment, banks were tightly managed, and taxes rose to feed the growing state. At the same time, socialism borrowed the language of freedom and fairness, casting itself as the progressive option. Soon, libertarianism stood at the fringe of politics, overshadowed by other movements. Yet, despite setbacks, the Libertarian Party in modern times emerged as a small but determined force. These early twists and turns show that libertarianism has a complicated legacy, often misunderstood, but still alive and ready to be rediscovered.
Chapter 2: Unraveling the Non-Aggression Principle: Why Violence-Free Cooperation Transforms Society.
At the core of libertarian thinking lies a simple but powerful idea: the non-aggression principle. It says that nobody should start violence against anyone else, and no one has the right to threaten harm to another’s body or property. This rule seems so obvious and fair, yet entire governments often break it. Imagine how much friendlier society could be if everyone, including those in charge, followed this principle. Instead of using force to get their way, people would rely on voluntary agreements and respectful choices. For libertarians, all their other beliefs flow from this starting point. Whether the issue is trade, personal habits, or social problems, the answer always begins with asking, Does this action hurt someone else or damage their property without their permission? If it does, it is simply not allowed.
Think about examples in daily life. If person A wants to sell a product and person B wants to buy it, they make a deal and trade fairly. Neither is forcing the other. But if someone tries to take another’s property without agreement, that’s aggression. Libertarians extend this understanding to all human activities. Even something like prostitution, if entered into voluntarily by adults, is not a crime in libertarian eyes. There’s no victim who is forced, so it’s not aggression. This might seem strange to some who believe that certain behaviors should be banned because they’re bad or immoral. But for libertarians, what matters is whether someone’s rights are harmed. Freedom means letting people make choices for themselves, as long as they don’t step on others’ toes.
Property rights are also central to libertarian values. If you mix your labor with natural materials to create something, that product is yours. If you build a house from wood you obtained fairly, it belongs to you. Others should not take it away or damage it. Over time, people trade and exchange property, passing ownership around freely. This allows creativity and prosperity to flourish. Libertarians see private property as an extension of a person’s own self, deserving the same protection against aggression. They believe that every right, including freedom of speech, is a type of property right. If you stand in your own home and speak your mind, no one should stop you because it’s your space and your voice.
However, the biggest rule-breaker is often the state itself. When regular citizens commit violence or theft, we call them criminals. But when governments go to war, or when they tax you without real choice, people often accept it as necessary. Libertarians argue that the state has no special moral rights and should be judged by the same standards as everyone else. War kills innocent people, and taxation takes money by force. Both would be crimes if you or I tried them. Yet, the state wraps its actions in fancy words like public good or common welfare to confuse people into thinking it’s okay. For libertarians, the truth remains: if it’s wrong for one person to do it, it’s wrong for a government to do it too.
Chapter 3: The Hidden Forms of Modern-Day Servitude and How the State Enforces Them.
Slavery is a thing of the past, right? We often think so because no one openly sells or owns other human beings as property anymore. Yet, libertarians warn that modern societies still force people to work for the state in subtler ways. Consider military drafts, where young people must risk their lives in wars they never chose. This is a direct violation of personal liberty. Libertarians argue that if a government can command you to fight and possibly die on its behalf, it is treating you like property it can use. Even though this might seem different from old-fashioned slavery, the principle is the same: you are being forced to serve someone else’s purpose against your will.
Taxes can also resemble a form of part-time slavery. Think about it: a portion of every dollar you earn is taken by the government, whether you like it or not. That means you spend part of your working hours effectively laboring for free to support activities you may never have agreed to. Some of that tax money might go to build roads or fund schools, but it also pays for things you might strongly dislike or never use. The key point is that this taking is not optional. If you try to stop paying taxes, you face punishment. This lack of consent makes the act feel like forced servitude.
Libertarians believe that true justice means holding criminals accountable to their victims, not making everyone pay through taxes for prisons and courts. Our current system often jails people before they are proven guilty, treating them as if they were already criminals. This is a kind of forced detention that disrespects individual rights. Victims pay taxes that fund jails, judges, and various officials, but this does not always lead to fair results. In a more libertarian model, justice would focus on restitution: the wrongdoer should compensate the victim, not just sit in a cell at everyone’s expense. This system would reduce forced labor because people wouldn’t be taxed for others’ misdeeds.
Another form of forced control appears in how we treat people with mental illnesses. In many places, a person can be locked up in a mental institution without their consent because authorities say they are dangerous or might become dangerous. But does the possibility of danger justify taking away their freedom? Libertarians think not. If we jail people simply because they might commit a crime, where does it stop? By that logic, every teenage boy might be a criminal-in-waiting and should be locked up. Obviously, that’s nonsense. Libertarians argue that no one’s freedom should be taken without a clear, direct violation of someone’s rights. This belief extends to all people, regardless of their health, background, or other characteristics. It’s about treating individuals as free, responsible beings, not tools of the state.
Chapter 4: When Morality Becomes Law: Why Dictating Personal Ethics Leads to Trouble.
Many of us believe certain things are wrong, like lying or cheating. But libertarians warn that turning every moral belief into a law causes huge problems. Moral codes often differ from one person to another. If the state picks one version of morality and forces everyone to follow it, it ends up punishing those who disagree. Take something like inciting a riot. If one person shouts about breaking the law and others actually do it, who is responsible? Libertarians say those who choose to riot are responsible because they acted by their own free will. Words alone aren’t crimes. Trying to ban speech because it’s immoral or dangerous can quickly become a tool for silencing differences, destroying freedom.
Consider pornography. Some people say it’s immoral and want it banned. Others see it as a personal choice that adults should be free to make. If the government outlaws it, it imposes one moral view on everyone. Or think about gun ownership. Some argue it’s reckless to let people have firearms; others say guns help the vulnerable protect themselves. By choosing who can and cannot own weapons, the government again decides whose morals matter more. For libertarians, the only question should be, Is anyone being harmed or forced? If not, it should remain legal, leaving moral judgments to individual conscience. Making morality into law often leads to attacking personal freedom, which should be protected at all costs.
In a world where the state tries to legislate morality, someone always ends up losing their basic liberties. If certain beliefs about behavior become official laws, then people who peacefully disagree find themselves treated like criminals. The danger is that once a government gets comfortable deciding what is morally correct, it might expand that power into other areas. Maybe it starts by banning pornography, then moves on to outlawing certain political opinions or religious practices. Before long, a culture of fear takes hold, with everyone worried about stepping out of line. Libertarians argue that only actions involving force or fraud should be illegal. Everything else is personal choice.
Ultimately, separating morality from legality keeps society fair. People should remain free to hold their own moral beliefs and guide their lives as they see fit. Laws should protect people’s rights to be free from aggression, not tell them how to think or behave in non-violent ways. By refusing to let the state choose a moral code, we protect the richness of human diversity and allow peaceful coexistence. If we understand that morality is personal and law is about preventing harm, we open the door for a more tolerant, respectful society. By not forcing moral views through government rules, we create space for understanding and voluntary growth, rather than controlling behavior through threats and punishment.
Chapter 5: State-Run Education and Welfare: The Unseen Burden on the Ones in Need.
Today, many assume that public education is good for everyone. Yet, it’s a relatively new idea. In some places, the government once tried to ban private schools, forcing all children into state-run classrooms with a one-size-fits-all curriculum. Groups like the Ku Klux Klan even pushed for laws that prevented immigrants and religious minorities from teaching their own children in their own way. This approach hurts diversity and makes learning less flexible. If parents had more choices, they could pick schools that suit their children’s personalities, helping them flourish. Instead, public schools often feel like factories, treating all students the same, regardless of individual talents or interests.
Welfare programs are another area where the state’s help can backfire. Although meant to assist the poor, welfare can trap people in a cycle of dependency. As welfare benefits rise, some find it easier to rely on government aid than to seek work. Even worse, taxes that fund these programs also come from low-income workers, who often see their earnings taken to support others they may never meet. This creates a strange system where poor taxpayers support other poor people who pay no taxes, while still struggling themselves.
If education were privatized, parents could choose schools that match their values and their children’s needs. Some might prefer religious schooling, others a system without grades, and still others schools focused on science, art, or technology. Free markets give room for different teaching styles to arise and compete, driving prices down and quality up. Similarly, without government welfare, private charities and mutual aid groups would flourish. Individuals and communities could directly help those in need, making sure support reaches the right people at the right time. This local, voluntary approach could be more caring and responsive than a distant bureaucracy.
Over time, as welfare spending grew, it failed to solve poverty effectively. Although fewer people live in extreme poverty, giant bureaucracies eat up resources. Libertarians argue that if the state steps out of these roles, people will find better solutions. Private schools and community-based support can adapt quickly, serve special needs, and encourage personal responsibility. When people rely on their neighbors, family, and friends, rather than a distant and impersonal state, they feel more respected and involved. By freeing education and welfare from government control, society can become fairer and more dynamic, giving everyone a chance to improve their situation. This way, real help flows from people who care, not from forced taxation and top-down rules.
Chapter 6: Unveiling the Monetary Illusions: How the Federal Reserve Stirs the Economic Storm.
Money might seem like a simple concept, but how it’s created and managed can greatly affect everyone’s life. Imagine if a family were allowed to print their own money. At first, they might use this power responsibly, but soon they’d be tempted to print more and buy fancy items they can’t truly afford. As more money floods into the system, prices rise because there are more dollars chasing the same amount of goods. In real life, something similar happens when the Federal Reserve, America’s central bank, controls the nation’s money supply. It can create money in ways that are tricky to understand, causing inflation and setting the economy on a wild roller coaster of boom and bust cycles.
The Federal Reserve can lend out far more money than it actually holds in reserve. This practice makes banks seem richer than they truly are, leading to many more loans at low interest rates. At first, people feel good because businesses borrow money to build factories, hire workers, and pay higher wages. However, this surge of easy money is artificial. Prices for everyday items begin to climb, and the economy becomes unbalanced. Eventually, the debt must be repaid, and when people cannot pay back all these loans, a recession hits. The Fed then steps in again, trying to fix the mess by injecting even more money, which only sets the stage for more problems later.
Inflation benefits the government. As prices rise, the dollars you hold become less valuable. Yet, the government can still collect taxes in these devalued dollars, effectively increasing its share. Over time, the constant printing of money picks your pocket without you noticing. It’s a hidden tax, one that takes wealth from ordinary people and hands it to those close to the source of new money. If you save your earnings, inflation eats away at them. If you rely on a fixed income, rising prices hurt your ability to buy what you need. This system fuels unhappiness and uncertainty, making life harder for everyone.
Libertarians believe that removing the state’s grip on money could bring stability. Without a central authority messing with the money supply, bankers, lenders, and borrowers would be more careful. Interest rates would reflect real market conditions, not artificial decisions made behind closed doors. Prices would stabilize, and people could trust that the value of their savings wouldn’t vanish overnight. Free-market money, possibly backed by commodities like gold, would keep inflation under control. As a result, the economy could grow more steadily, and people could plan for the future without fear that their wealth will be quietly drained by inflation or sudden economic collapse. By unleashing money from government manipulation, we help ensure that wealth remains honestly earned and fairly used.
Chapter 7: Private Streets, Courts, and Security: Imagining a World Without State Monopolies.
It’s hard to picture life without government services because we’ve never really experienced it. Think of shoes: if the government had always controlled shoe production, people would ask, Who will make our shoes if not the state? But in reality, private shoe companies compete to offer better and cheaper footwear. This same logic can apply to services like roads, police, and even courts. If these things were privatized, they might become more efficient, cheaper, and more responsive. Neighborhoods, for example, might own their own streets, and landlords in the area would be eager to keep them safe and clean because better streets mean happier tenants and higher property values.
Without government-controlled roads, private owners would do their best to reduce traffic jams and accidents to attract more users and earn profits. They’d find creative solutions, maybe pricing roads during rush hours or offering discounts at off-peak times. Private police could be hired by street owners or neighborhoods, ensuring safety without a bloated public system. These security forces would have strong incentives to protect people’s rights because their reputation and contracts depend on it. If they fail, customers can choose another provider, unlike today, where taxpayers have no choice in which police force they fund.
Legal disputes could also be handled by private courts or arbitration agencies. Imagine you believe someone stole from you. Instead of a government court, you might choose a private legal service with a reputation for fairness and accuracy. The accused might pick another. If two courts disagree, they could go to a third neutral court for a final ruling. Decisions would be guided by a desire to maintain trust and credibility in the community. Those who refuse to follow fair judgments would soon find themselves boycotted by neighbors and businesses, which would naturally pressure them to act responsibly.
This kind of world might sound complicated, but it places power back into the hands of individuals, communities, and consumers. Instead of accepting whatever the government provides, people could pick and choose services that best fit their needs. Competition encourages better quality and lower costs. Would this system work smoothly all the time? Probably not perfectly, but neither does the current system. Libertarians believe that, overall, freeing these services from state monopoly would let innovation and cooperation shine. Over time, we would learn which methods work best, guided by trial, error, and the natural human drive to solve problems rather than relying on force and no-choice options.
Chapter 8: Reclaiming the Environment: A Free Market Path to Preserving Our Planet.
We hear a lot about environmental damage, and many people blame capitalism for pollution and resource depletion. But libertarians see things differently. They note that, thanks to capitalism, billions of people live better than ever before. Life before modern industry was harsh and limited. Today, technology and trade support huge populations comfortably. Libertarians argue that, when properly structured, free markets can also solve environmental issues. The trick is to give clear ownership to resources like forests, rivers, and air. When someone owns something valuable, they have a reason to care for it, maintain it, and prevent abuse by others.
Consider copper. If a mining company extracts too much copper at once, it makes quick profits but risks running out of copper for future earnings. Good managers think long-term. They pace their extraction to keep making profits later. The free market naturally encourages careful use of scarce resources. However, when governments manage natural resources, they often lease land for short periods, giving companies no reason to protect it. These companies just grab what they can and leave. By privatizing resources, owners must think ahead to preserve their wealth.
Forests provide a perfect example. When the state controls them, logging companies rush in, chop down trees, and move on. No one cares to replant or manage the forest healthily because they don’t own it. If they did own it, they’d have every reason to ensure that trees continue growing, securing future profits. Pollution also thrives where property rights are unclear. If a company owned a river and someone tried to dump waste into it, the owner would stop them, or sue them, to maintain the river’s quality. Without ownership, everyone treats the resource as a free dumping ground.
Even sewage problems could be solved if people had to pay the real cost of disposal. Right now, government-funded sewage treatment hides the expense. If people had to handle their own waste, technologies like eco-friendly toilets would become popular, making pollution less of an issue. This approach may feel odd at first, but it relies on basic human motivations. People protect what they own. By applying this principle to nature, libertarians believe we can restore balance. Over time, better technologies, responsible ownership, and legal protections for property would reduce pollution and preserve resources. Thus, the environment thrives not by top-down commands, but through responsibility, respect, and careful stewardship in a free market.
Chapter 9: Choosing Peace Over War: Why Non-Intervention Sparks Safer and Freer Societies.
Libertarians often strongly oppose war. They are not just being dreamy pacifists; they see war as a terrible aggression against innocent people. In a perfect libertarian world, without big governments, wars would be rare. There would be no huge armies forcing young people to fight. But we live in a world of states, each with its own military and ambitions. Still, libertarians argue that countries should mind their own business and avoid meddling in foreign conflicts. By respecting others’ independence, we reduce violence and suffering.
Long ago, warfare was smaller and less deadly. Kings might have fought each other, but ordinary villagers were often left alone. Modern war, however, involves entire populations, with bombs dropping on cities and civilians paying the highest price. Nationalism pushes states to claim they represent the people’s will, making everyone a target. Advanced weapons mean more destruction and death. Libertarians believe that, unless attacked directly, a country should not intervene militarily. Doing so only encourages more violence, spreads suffering, and draws innocent people into conflicts they had no part in starting.
Some argue that intervention is like stopping a mugger in the street. But this comparison fails. In a mugging, stepping in might help the victim. In war, stepping in often means bombing entire neighborhoods, harming people who had nothing to do with the original conflict. Moreover, by intervening, a state risks dragging its own people into a war they never wanted. It’s as if the police, trying to stop one mugger, decide to blow up the whole block, punishing everyone involved and not involved alike.
Libertarians support the right of individuals to defend themselves from direct aggression. If people in a region resist their own oppressive government, that’s their choice. Guerrilla warfare, where locals defend their homes, might be more justifiable because it directly counters an aggressor in a limited way. But big states jumping into faraway wars almost always means innocent bloodshed and wasted resources. By following a path of non-intervention, countries encourage peaceful trade, cultural exchange, and diplomacy. Over time, mutual respect and conversation might replace bullets and bombs, leading to safer, freer societies where freedom, not force, guides human relations.
Chapter 10: From Shoe-Making to Society-Building: Rethinking the Role of Government Services.
Let’s go back to the shoe-making story. If the government always made and distributed shoes, we’d be nervous about letting the private sector do it. But as soon as we imagine private companies in charge, we realize they’d compete to offer better choices. The same logic applies to countless services we think only government can handle. Why not police, courts, roads, and even money? If people are free to choose, private providers will try hard to please their customers. If one company does a bad job, people switch to another. Choice is key to improving quality.
Government services often lack competition. You get what the government gives, whether it’s good or bad. This lack of choice leads to wasted resources, slow improvements, and poor customer service. No wonder people complain about long lines at government offices, confusing rules, or services that don’t meet their needs. By letting private services arise, we open the door to innovation. Different companies might experiment with new methods, technologies, and ideas. The best ones survive because people voluntarily support them.
For example, consider roads. Private road owners would try different ways to reduce congestion. Maybe special lanes for frequent travelers, discounts at quiet times, or better maintenance plans. If one method fails, another can be tried without waiting years for government permission. This agility makes life easier for everyone. Also, in a free market system, those who provide services know they must satisfy their clients or go out of business. This direct feedback loop ensures constant improvement and fairness, rather than relying on taxes that people must pay no matter what.
By applying the principle used in shoe-making – free competition – to other areas, we imagine a world where each service evolves to meet people’s actual needs. When governments step aside, individuals and communities find new ways to solve problems. They form clubs, associations, businesses, or charities that handle tasks once reserved for the state. Over time, people learn from mistakes, discard failed solutions, and keep refining successful ones. The result is a more flexible, adaptable society that respects freedom of choice. Just as private shoe companies improved footwear quality over generations, private solutions could improve security, infrastructure, and many other services that shape our daily lives.
Chapter 11: A New Dawn of Liberty: Embracing Individual Freedom to Rethink the Future.
We’ve seen how libertarians question almost everything we take for granted about government. They challenge the idea that we need a central authority to manage our schools, money, roads, or even our personal choices. Instead, they believe that respecting individual freedom, property rights, and voluntary cooperation can create a safer, richer, and more just society. The world they imagine is not chaotic lawlessness; it’s a place where problems are solved by mutual agreement, open competition, and innovation, not by force.
In this vision, the state no longer acts like a highway robber, seizing resources and limiting options. Instead, people freely choose their paths. When neighbors own their streets, they keep them clean and safe. When schools compete, they teach in flexible ways that help every child shine. When private charities replace distant welfare agencies, aid becomes personal, meaningful, and adapted to real needs. When money is free from government control, inflation loses its power to harm savers and workers. And when societies mind their own affairs, war becomes rarer, and peace more common.
This future demands that we trust ourselves and one another. It requires breaking away from the belief that only governments can guide us. History shows that people can create language, art, technology, and entire economic systems without top-down instructions. Why not trust the same creativity and goodwill to produce fairness, safety, and prosperity without forcing anyone’s hand? Libertarians argue that people, when allowed to follow their own interests and respect others, form a natural order more efficient and moral than any imposed system.
The journey toward such a society won’t be easy. Many fear losing the familiar structures of government. But by carefully considering libertarian ideas, we begin to see cracks in the old reasoning. What if we can do better? What if freedom is not just an ideal, but a practical tool to build brighter futures? If you accept that individuals should not commit aggression, why let governments do it? If voluntary cooperation can work in countless parts of life, why not more? As you close this book, remember that these questions aim to spark thought. You may not agree with every libertarian solution, but exploring them helps you look critically at the world. Perhaps you’ll find new respect for freedom and discover that a new dawn of liberty is possible.
All about the Book
Explore the revolutionary ideas in ‘For a New Liberty’ by Murray N. Rothbard. This powerful treatise argues for a free society, championing individual liberty, voluntary cooperation, and the moral foundations of a libertarian political order.
Murray N. Rothbard was a prominent economist and political theorist, known for his advocacy of libertarianism and the Austrian School of economics, profoundly influencing modern libertarian thought.
Economists, Political Scientists, Libertarian Activists, Philosophers, History Teachers
Reading Economics, Libertarian Philosophy, Public Speaking, Writing Essays, Debating Policies
Government Overreach, Personal Freedom, Economic Interventionism, Socialism vs. Capitalism
Liberty is not a gift, it is a natural right that must be preserved and defended.
Ron Paul, Thomas Woods, Peter Schiff
Liberty Institute’s Book of the Year, Freeman Award for Libertarian Literature, Cato Institute’s Outstanding Contribution Award
1. Understand basic principles of libertarian philosophy. #2. Learn about individual rights and freedoms. #3. Recognize government’s role in societal issues. #4. Comprehend the concept of voluntary cooperation. #5. Explore free-market economics and benefits. #6. Grasp the critique of state interventions. #7. Identify non-aggression principle in practice. #8. Appreciate historical context of libertarian ideas. #9. Discover the importance of property rights. #10. Analyze the failures of centralized planning. #11. Investigate consequences of government regulations. #12. Look into the privatization of public services. #13. Examine challenges to personal liberty. #14. Question the legitimacy of state authority. #15. Uncover misconceptions about capitalist systems. #16. Discern differences between anarchism and statism. #17. Assess the impact of taxation on society. #18. Study decentralization as a political strategy. #19. Evaluate alternatives to traditional justice systems. #20. Consider peaceful means of societal change.
For a New Liberty, Murray N. Rothbard, libertarianism, political philosophy, free market economics, anarcho-capitalism, liberty and freedom, government and state, voluntaryism, economic theory, individual rights, self-ownership
https://www.amazon.com/For-New-Liberty-Murray-Rothbard/dp/0945466341
https://audiofire.in/wp-content/uploads/covers/408.png
https://www.youtube.com/@audiobooksfire
audiofireapplink