Introduction
Summary of the book Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill. Before moving forward, let’s briefly explore the core idea of the book. Step closer and discover a moral philosophy that dares to question old certainties. Instead of obeying ancient rules or bowing to fear, utilitarianism asks: what truly makes life better? In an age of frantic change and tough decisions—from runaway trolleys to global issues like climate change—this approach seeks measurable improvements in well-being. By using happiness as our guiding star, we navigate ethical puzzles with an eye to consequences. Each choice becomes a test: does it help us thrive, learn, and support one another? John Stuart Mill’s vision encourages higher pleasures over quick thrills, empathy over stubborn pride, and fairness over blind tradition. As you journey through these chapters, you’ll see how a philosophy built on happiness can reshape justice, challenge outdated norms, and guide us toward a more caring, forward-looking world.
Chapter 1: Standing Beside the Runaway Trolley—A Curious Encounter with Ethical Choices that Defy Quick Answers .
Imagine yourself standing on a quiet street, minding your own business, when suddenly you notice a runaway trolley racing down the tracks. It rattles like a furious machine, totally out of control, and ahead of it stands a crowd of innocent people who have no idea what’s coming. You look around desperately and see a lever at your side—one that, if pulled, would redirect the trolley onto a different track. But that track has a single person standing on it. The choice is yours, and it’s painful: let the trolley continue on its current path and harm many people, or pull the lever and sacrifice one individual. This kind of nightmarish puzzle, known as the trolley problem, isn’t just a riddle. It’s a gateway into a fascinating world of moral philosophy, one that challenges our deepest instincts about right and wrong.
Such dilemmas were explored by thinkers like John Stuart Mill, a 19th-century British philosopher who believed we should measure our actions by the happiness they produce. For Mill, the moral worth of any choice depends on the consequences it yields. This radical approach to ethics is known as utilitarianism, and it turned traditional moral thinking on its head. Rather than relying on fixed rules, traditions, or religious teachings, utilitarianism demands that we weigh options, consider outcomes, and select the path that leads to the greatest overall good. Mill’s central insight was that happiness—our sense of well-being and fulfillment—should guide our ethical decisions. By imagining the trolley problem, Mill’s principles become clearer: is it better to save many at the expense of one, or to refrain from acting at all? These are the weighty questions at the heart of his philosophy.
Before Mill, many people believed morality was about following commands carved in stone by authorities—be they kings, priests, or ancient customs. But Mill’s perspective invites us to think critically. He pushes us to ask: what will bring about the greatest happiness for everyone involved? Consider real-life scenarios that mirror the trolley problem—moments in hospitals, at busy intersections, in emergency shelters. These are places where critical decisions must be made swiftly, often in moments of panic and uncertainty. Mill’s utilitarian approach suggests that if there’s a way to reduce overall suffering, that way is more morally justified than simply doing nothing or acting according to habit. By applying the principle of utility, we are forced to confront not only the outcome of our actions, but also the reasoning that led us there.
Yet, this approach doesn’t guarantee easy answers. Even Mill recognized that no single formula can solve all moral quandaries instantly. The trolley problem serves as a vivid introduction, helping us see that choosing one life over many can feel deeply unsettling. But facing that discomfort is part of the journey. Utilitarianism is about looking beyond rigid rules and focusing on real-world consequences. Mill’s work invites us to consider the intricate web of human lives affected by our decisions. This is no simple puzzle—it’s a door opening into a philosophy that deals with education, justice, personal freedoms, social reforms, and much more. By starting with the trolley problem, we set the stage for an exploration into a world where the yardstick of moral action isn’t a commandment, but the measurable impact on human happiness and well-being.
Chapter 2: From Child Prodigy to Courageous Thinker—How Mill’s Early Life Sparked Revolutionary Ethical Visions .
John Stuart Mill was born into an environment humming with intellectual curiosity. His father, James Mill, was determined to craft a brilliant mind, and from a very young age, John was immersed in the world of ideas. By the time he reached adolescence, he wasn’t just reading classical works in ancient Greek and Latin—he was engaging them, debating their premises, and questioning their conclusions. He was never a passive learner. His childhood resembled a training ground for critical thought, where ideas were tools to be sharpened. The intense educational regimen might seem daunting, even extreme, but it forged a thinker who did not flinch from tackling big questions. Long before he wrote about morality or politics, Mill was a restless explorer of knowledge, laying the foundation for the new moral landscapes he would one day chart.
This upbringing did not simply produce a well-read scholar—it developed a thinker who dared to challenge the status quo. In a time when many accepted inherited beliefs without complaint, Mill questioned the assumptions of his era. He recognized early on that societal progress depended on testing ideas, not just cherishing them. While most children dreamt of simpler futures, Mill wrestled with philosophies that shaped empires and civilizations. This hunger for truth and understanding would later fuel his ethical investigations, pushing him to ask: What kind of world do we want to build? How can we weigh human pleasure and suffering to ensure a fair, just existence for all? These weren’t idle curiosities; they were the seeds of a moral framework that would shift thinking away from blind tradition toward conscious consideration of consequences.
As Mill grew, he found himself increasingly drawn to debates over individual freedom, social justice, and the role of government. His intellectual maturation coincided with a rapidly changing world, one where industrial revolutions, expanding democracies, and emerging sciences challenged long-held assumptions. Mill’s voice rose at a time when people were rethinking power structures, women’s rights, and the moral foundations of entire societies. He saw that understanding happiness involved more than personal comfort. It meant considering education policies that broaden horizons for the poor, reforms that empower women to join public life, and legal frameworks that protect freedoms. This conviction took shape most elegantly in his ethical writing, where the pursuit of collective happiness became not just a philosophical stance, but a practical guide for reforming the world.
Mill’s youthful struggles—including bouts of depression and periods of intense intellectual doubt—only strengthened his resolve. He realized that happiness wasn’t something shallow or fleeting. To him, happiness was not just about pleasure; it involved depth, meaning, creativity, self-expression, and the freedom to grow. He read widely, absorbing influences like Jeremy Bentham, who first championed the principle of utility. Yet Mill added his own dimension: he recognized that pleasure differs in quality, not just quantity. His moral philosophy began to form: to decide if something was right or wrong, you looked at its consequences for overall well-being. The earlier chapters of his life show how a child schooled in classical thought, a young man shaped by the tensions of his time, and an adult determined to uplift human life, could create a philosophy of lasting relevance.
Chapter 3: At the Heart of Morality—Discovering Why Happiness Anchors Our Ethical Compass in a Complex World .
To Mill, happiness was not some trivial luxury; it was the very bedrock upon which moral decisions should rest. He argued that every human action has outcomes that ripple outward, affecting not just one person, but entire communities. If we seek to understand morality, why not focus on what truly matters to people—whether their lives are rich, fulfilling, and free from needless suffering? Mill’s principle of utility suggests that when uncertain about how to act, we should choose the option that maximizes overall happiness. He wanted to build morality on solid ground: real experiences, genuine well-being, and measurable improvements in people’s quality of life. In a world brimming with traditions, dogmas, and complex religious teachings, Mill’s approach offered a fresh, human-centered perspective. Happiness, he believed, could guide us more reliably than arbitrary rules.
To understand why happiness might serve as an ethical cornerstone, consider how we naturally seek pleasure and avoid pain. Whether choosing a career, planning a family trip, or volunteering time, we lean toward what feels positive and fulfilling. Mill’s insight was to elevate this basic human instinct into a moral principle. Instead of seeing morality as divine commandments or ancient customs, he rooted it in the human experience of joy and suffering. Of course, happiness is not always straightforward—what makes one person happy might not work for another. Still, Mill believed we could identify common conditions for human flourishing, like freedom from oppression, access to education, meaningful work, and opportunities to form supportive relationships. By focusing on these conditions, societies could craft laws and policies that genuinely improve the lives of their citizens.
But what about those who claim morality should be selfless, that it should ignore personal desire in favor of some higher virtue? Mill recognized this challenge. He did not advocate for simple, shallow pleasures. Instead, he distinguished between qualities of happiness. Higher pleasures, like engaging with literature, exploring new ideas, or expressing ourselves artistically, bring deeper and more lasting fulfillment than fleeting moments of physical enjoyment. By striving for these higher pleasures, we elevate the overall happiness of society, creating richer cultural landscapes and more thoughtful communities. Mill’s moral framework respects human complexity: people are capable of spiritual growth, intellectual breakthroughs, creative triumphs, and acts of compassion that transcend base desires. When we measure actions by their contribution to lasting well-being, we align ethical choices with the most profound aspects of human potential.
Far from encouraging selfishness, Mill’s utilitarianism encourages us to consider everyone’s happiness, not just our own. It pushes us to look beyond immediate gratification and ask: How will this decision affect others now and in the future? Will it expand opportunities, reduce harm, inspire progress, and promote understanding? By placing happiness at the heart of morality, Mill invites us to see ourselves as members of a global family. Our joys and sorrows are interconnected. A decision made in one corner of the world—such as how we consume resources—can influence living conditions elsewhere. In this sense, seeking the greatest overall happiness becomes not just an ethical theory, but a road map for compassion, cooperation, and long-term thinking. It’s a guideline that bridges gaps between cultures, beliefs, and generations, helping us navigate an increasingly complex planet.
Chapter 4: Not All Pleasures Are Equal—Exploring the Finer Textures of Happiness and the Richer Path to Well-Being .
One of Mill’s most significant contributions to moral thought is his insistence that pleasures differ in quality. Imagine a banquet of possible enjoyments: the excitement of a theme park ride, the comfort of a sweet dessert, the quiet thrill of learning something new, the uplifting feeling of helping a friend. Mill would say these pleasures aren’t all on the same level. Some, like intellectual discovery or meaningful creativity, nurture our minds and spirits in ways that purely physical pleasures cannot match. He believed that human beings, with their capacities for reason, empathy, and self-expression, can experience more profound happiness by pursuing activities that enrich our understanding and bring us closer to our full potential. This is not about snobbery, but about recognizing that what truly sustains our well-being isn’t just momentary delight, but deeper and more lasting fulfillment.
To clarify this point, think about reading a challenging but enlightening book. At first, it might not bring the same immediate burst of pleasure as eating a delicious slice of cake. But as you read, learn, and reflect, the insights gained can shape your outlook, spark your imagination, and enhance your sense of purpose. This intellectual pleasure, though subtler, may have longer-lasting benefits, touching other aspects of your life. Similarly, working hard to master a musical instrument or dedicating time to volunteer for a charity might not always be pleasant in the simplest sense, but the sense of accomplishment, contribution, and growth that follows creates a richer tapestry of happiness. For Mill, these higher forms of pleasure contribute more significantly to a flourishing life and a thriving society.
This idea that not all pleasures carry the same moral weight expands our understanding of utilitarianism. It tells us that maximizing happiness isn’t just a numbers game where we count pleasures. Instead, we must consider the quality and depth of these experiences. A society obsessed only with easy thrills might end up shallow, while one that encourages education, arts, meaningful work, and supportive relationships can reach more enduring well-being. By acknowledging that some pleasures uplift the human spirit more sustainably, we open doors to cultural enrichment, scientific discovery, personal achievement, and social empathy. Rather than flattening all happiness into a single dimension, Mill’s view reveals a layered landscape of human fulfillment, where intellectual and moral growth matter deeply.
This richer understanding of happiness also suggests that ethical decisions should strive to encourage higher pleasures for as many people as possible. It might guide a government’s decision to invest in libraries, schools, cultural programs, and community centers, rather than mere entertainment. It might inspire individuals to mentor others, create art, or share knowledge. By nudging society toward deeper forms of happiness, Mill’s utilitarian framework becomes a guide not just for personal choices, but also for policymakers, educators, and leaders. They can shape environments where people find meaning, respect, and a chance to contribute to something greater than themselves. In this way, utilitarianism moves beyond a dry calculation and becomes a vision of human flourishing, mapping out a world where everyone can access the rich layers of joy and growth that make life truly rewarding.
Chapter 5: Challenging the Critics—Why Utilitarianism Stands Strong Against Traditional, Fear-Based, or Self-Denying Moralities .
Utilitarianism did not emerge in a philosophical vacuum. It pushed against older moral systems that leaned on rigid traditions, unquestioned religious commands, or the fear of punishment to enforce right behavior. Mill insisted that morality should not be about simply following orders passed down through generations. He argued that any moral guideline ignoring overall happiness was missing a crucial element. Some critics claimed that old customs were sacred and that challenging them would unravel society. But Mill believed clinging blindly to outdated rules often results in needless suffering. By focusing on happiness, he brought moral reasoning down to Earth, asking, What truly improves people’s lives? His approach welcomed debate, openness, and self-examination. He was not content with morality that relied on fear, asserting that a truly stable ethical system must be grounded in positive, beneficial outcomes.
Mill also challenged moralities that celebrated suffering as a virtue in itself. Certain traditions held that denying oneself pleasure was inherently good, as if hardship alone proved moral strength. But Mill questioned this logic. If self-denial doesn’t contribute to any greater good, why admire it? If it leads only to frustration, resentment, or needless pain, how does it help anyone flourish? By shining a spotlight on consequences, Mill exposed the emptiness of moralities that worship suffering for its own sake. Instead, he argued that we should assess sacrifice by its effect on human well-being. For instance, forgoing personal comfort to help others is commendable not because suffering is glorious, but because it increases overall happiness. Without a focus on outcomes, morality can become a hollow set of rituals rather than a tool for real improvement.
Another common criticism Mill addressed was that utilitarianism might justify selfishness. After all, if everyone pursues happiness, wouldn’t people just seek personal pleasure at the expense of others? Mill countered this by stressing that utilitarianism demands a broad view. We must consider everyone’s happiness, not just our own. Self-interest alone is not the final measure; what matters is the net increase in well-being. By encouraging us to recognize that our happiness is linked to others, utilitarianism counters pure selfishness. It teaches empathy and cooperation, pushing society toward policies that uplift the many instead of pampering the privileged few. Mill anticipated that critics would worry about short-sighted interpretations of utility, but he clarified that genuine utilitarian thinking involves reason, foresight, and fairness, building an ethical framework that aligns personal choices with collective welfare.
These engagements with opposing viewpoints show that utilitarianism’s strength lies in its adaptability and reasoned approach. Rather than shrinking before criticism, Mill’s philosophy grows stronger by answering objections with clarity and logic. He understood that skepticism, doubt, and disagreement are signs of a healthy intellectual environment, not threats to avoid. In responding to critics who clung to unexamined tradition, embraced fear as a moral motivator, or celebrated needless suffering, Mill refined utilitarianism into a more mature and robust system. It thrives on testing its ideas, adjusting to new insights, and always returning to the central question: does this choice help create a happier, more fulfilling world? By meeting criticism head-on, Mill demonstrated that a morality rooted in consequences can offer a flexible yet principled guide to ethical decision-making in a changing world.
Chapter 6: Justice and Punishment—Reimagining Legal Systems That Serve the Greatest Good Without Blind Retribution .
When we think about justice, we often picture judges, juries, and laws carved in stone. Many traditions treated justice as a set of fixed rules backed by threats of punishment. But Mill’s utilitarian lens urges us to see justice in terms of outcomes. How does a punishment affect everyone involved—the victim, the offender, and the community? The goal isn’t simply to follow old codes, nor to satisfy rage or vengeance. Instead, justice should make society better. If a law deters harmful acts and encourages fairness, if it protects the innocent and rehabilitates wrongdoers, it’s serving a greater purpose. Mill’s perspective nudges us to rethink old notions of justice, replacing blind retribution with careful analysis. Punishment, in this sense, should be proportional, reasonable, and aimed at restoring well-being rather than indulging fury.
Imagine a case of theft: A desperate person steals food because they cannot afford it. Traditional morality might demand harsh penalties to scare others into obedience. Utilitarian reasoning asks a different set of questions: Will severe punishment reduce future harm, or create more suffering and resentment? Would it be more beneficial to address underlying causes, like poverty and lack of opportunity, so fewer people resort to crime in the first place? By focusing on results, this approach encourages solutions that uplift rather than simply crush. It suggests that a just society doesn’t rely on fear or cruelty, but invests in education, support services, and economic reforms that prevent crime at its roots. Thus, the justice system transforms into a force guided by data, empathy, and the pursuit of shared happiness.
Utilitarian justice also faces hard questions. How do we measure the impact of policies on happiness? How do we avoid simply pleasing the majority at the expense of minorities or vulnerable groups? Mill acknowledged these complexities, noting that justice involves balancing the rights of individuals with the greater social good. Yet, if we ground our legal decisions in improving lives and reducing harm, we avoid brutal punishments that serve no constructive purpose. A good justice system aims for rehabilitation, understanding that helping offenders become better citizens can improve everyone’s quality of life. By carefully weighing the long-term consequences of legal actions, utilitarian-minded reforms might reduce prison populations, break cycles of violence, and create conditions in which communities thrive rather than fear their own institutions.
This forward-thinking approach resonates in current debates over criminal justice reform, restorative justice programs, and mental health interventions. Instead of clinging to outdated traditions, policymakers who embrace utilitarian principles might design systems that protect victims, hold offenders accountable, and foster personal growth. They ask: What response will truly make things better for society? By using evidence-based practices and encouraging a spirit of compassion, justice stops looking like a blunt instrument and starts becoming a tool for healing wounds and preserving happiness. Such an approach does not ignore the pain caused by wrongdoing. Instead, it aims to transform suffering into an opportunity for correction and improvement. In doing so, utilitarian justice charts a path away from age-old cycles of revenge and toward a more enlightened, empathetic, and beneficial form of public life.
Chapter 7: Beyond the Courtroom—Applying Utilitarian Thinking to the Toughest Moral Dilemmas of Everyday Life .
It’s easy to see utilitarianism as an abstract theory or something reserved for intellectual debates. But Mill intended it as a practical guide for everyone. Consider how doctors, teachers, and parents make tough decisions daily. A doctor with limited resources in a crowded hospital must decide who gets the last available ventilator. A teacher running out of time in a semester must choose which crucial lessons to emphasize. A parent might struggle between working extra hours for financial security or spending more time at home nurturing relationships. These dilemmas are not solved by old customs alone. Utilitarian thinking encourages us to step back and assess the ripple effects: How does each choice affect happiness, health, knowledge, and emotional well-being? By considering the widest possible impact, we may find more balanced, humane solutions.
Take a global example: climate change. Traditional moral codes never confronted this modern crisis directly, but utilitarian reasoning can help us respond. Climate change affects countless lives—future generations, endangered species, entire ecosystems. By applying the principle of utility, we ask: How can we reduce harm for the most beings over the longest time? This question encourages policies like clean energy initiatives, sustainable agriculture, and international cooperation. Instead of asking what traditions say or what short-term profits demand, utilitarianism invites us to consider planetary well-being. The approach pushes us to weigh our choices against their long-term consequences, ensuring that we don’t sacrifice the happiness of tomorrow for the comforts of today. This mindset can reshape how we address environmental challenges, public health crises, or humanitarian emergencies.
This careful, consequence-oriented perspective can guide personal behavior as well. Consider everyday decisions: which products to buy, which words to use when talking to others, how to spend free time. By asking ourselves, Will this choice likely increase overall happiness or reduce it? we become more thoughtful consumers, kinder neighbors, and more responsible citizens. For example, purchasing fair-trade items supports better working conditions and helps entire communities. Speaking respectfully, even when disagreeing, reduces unnecessary tension. Balancing personal leisure with community service creates a more harmonious social fabric. Utilitarian thinking challenges us to move beyond self-centered impulses and toward actions that lift us all up. It encourages us to listen, learn, and adapt, ensuring that our moral compass points toward genuine, tangible improvements in the world.
Of course, utilitarianism isn’t a magic key that instantly solves moral puzzles. Hard choices remain, and so do disagreements about what the greatest good looks like. Different people value different things, and consequences can be unpredictable. But even these uncertainties can inspire deeper thought. Rather than freeze in confusion, utilitarianism nudges us to gather information, consider multiple perspectives, and remain flexible. We might not always get it right, but by adopting a mindset that focuses on outcomes, we can continually refine our moral reasoning. By doing so, utilitarianism becomes less of a strict formula and more of a guiding principle—one that encourages empathy, inquiry, and a willingness to learn from mistakes. This continuous refinement ensures that moral thinking evolves alongside a world that never stands still.
Chapter 8: Evolving Understandings—Adapting Utilitarian Ideas for a Rapidly Changing World Where Compassion Guides Moral Progress .
The world that Mill knew was already changing dramatically, but today’s reality is even more complex. As we confront digital technologies, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and global networks, moral reasoning becomes both more urgent and more intricate. Utilitarianism remains relevant because it helps us navigate these uncharted territories with a simple yet powerful question: What’s the overall impact on well-being? When we consider how a new app affects mental health, how a policy influences economic equality, or how a technology reshapes our relationship with nature, utilitarianism gives us a framework for thinking. The idea is not to impose one-size-fits-all solutions, but to remain guided by outcomes that enhance human and environmental flourishing. This responsiveness ensures that utilitarianism can adapt to new challenges and continue guiding ethical progress.
As societies grow more interconnected, our actions reverberate across continents. A product made on one side of the world influences workers’ rights and environmental conditions on the other. Mill’s principle that we consider everyone’s happiness is more critical than ever. We must remember that people living far away, future generations yet unborn, and the ecosystems supporting all life deserve ethical consideration. Utilitarianism’s global scope encourages policies and personal choices that respect diversity and strive for fairness. It also encourages dialogue and compromise, as we seek solutions that maximize well-being rather than clinging to narrow interests. By embracing this expansive view, we treat morality as a collective endeavor. Instead of static rules, we have a shared project: to continually discover and implement ways to improve conditions for all.
Though more than a century old, Mill’s utilitarianism feels remarkably modern because it values adaptability. As we learn more about psychology, education, governance, or environmental science, we update our judgments about what increases happiness. We refine our measurements, develop better indicators of well-being, and use evidence to guide action. What might have once seemed like a difficult guess becomes an informed decision when backed by data and reasoned debate. We can test policies on small scales, learn from mistakes, and adjust before causing widespread harm. In this sense, utilitarian thinking aligns with the scientific spirit—it’s always open to revising assumptions and improving strategies, ensuring that moral progress doesn’t stagnate.
As we continue to wrestle with challenges old and new, utilitarianism remains a vital tool. It doesn’t deny that people hold different values or that moral dilemmas can be heartbreaking. Instead, it offers a unifying principle: seek to make life better for everyone involved. This principle transcends borders, transcends centuries, and transcends dogma. It reminds us that morality isn’t about obedience or suffering—it’s about understanding consequences, showing compassion, and forging a path toward collective well-being. By keeping happiness at the center of ethical thinking, we keep our eyes on what truly matters: a future in which more people can thrive, learn, create, and love. In a world of constant change, utilitarianism’s flexible, outcome-focused approach ensures we remain anchored to the deepest human aspiration—to create a world worth living in.
All about the Book
Explore the profound implications of utilitarianism with John Stuart Mill’s essential treatise. This timeless work challenges moral philosophy, emphasizing the pursuit of happiness and consequentialist ethics, making it crucial for thinkers and decision-makers alike.
John Stuart Mill was a pioneering philosopher and political economist whose ideas shaped modern liberalism. His advocacy for individual liberty, utilitarian ethics, and social justice remains influential in contemporary discussions.
Philosophers, Politicians, Economists, Ethicists, Social Scientists
Philosophical Debates, Reading Classics, Ethics Discussions, Political Activism, Social Justice Advocacy
Moral Philosophy, Utilitarian Ethics, Individual Rights, Social Welfare
Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.
Richard Dawkins, Noam Chomsky, Amartya Sen
The American Philosophical Association’s Book Prize, The John Locke Prize in Philosophy, The Royal Society of Arts Award
1. What does happiness truly mean in our lives? #2. How do our actions impact the greater good? #3. Can utilitarianism guide moral decision-making effectively? #4. What is the significance of pleasure and pain? #5. How can we measure the quality of happiness? #6. Are individual rights considered in utilitarian ethics? #7. How does utilitarianism differ from other moral theories? #8. What challenges arise when applying utilitarian principles? #9. How do we balance personal happiness with society’s welfare? #10. Can utilitarianism justify difficult moral choices? #11. What role does justice play in achieving utility? #12. How can we hold moral responsibility under utilitarianism? #13. Can utilitarianism address issues of environmental ethics? #14. How does cultural context influence utilitarian judgments? #15. What are the limitations of a utilitarian approach? #16. How do emotions affect utilitarian evaluations of actions? #17. Is there a difference between act and rule utilitarianism? #18. How can utilitarianism apply to everyday decision-making? #19. What historical cases illustrate utilitarian principles in action? #20. Can utilitarianism evolve with changing societal values?
Utilitarianism philosophy, John Stuart Mill ethics, Consequentialism explained, Moral philosophy books, Ethical theories and principles, Utilitarianism summary, John Stuart Mill works, Philosophy for beginners, Utilitarianism analysis, Philosophical debates, Best philosophy books, Mill’s moral theory
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1515439123
https://audiofire.in/wp-content/uploads/covers/3273.png
https://www.youtube.com/@audiobooksfire
audiofireapplink