Introduction
Summary of the Book The New Breed by Kate Darling Before we proceed, let’s look into a brief overview of the book. Imagine holding a book that peels back the layers of modern fears about robots and artificial intelligence. Instead of predicting a grim future where metal creatures replace us or rob us of purpose, this story whispers a different truth. It invites you to see robots not as human-like threats, but as companions similar to the animals that once guided our ancestors. By drifting through these pages, you’ll discover how centuries of working with oxen, dogs, and pigeons can shape how we handle tomorrow’s intelligent devices. You’ll realize that ethical laws, careful designs, and open-hearted thinking can usher in a time when robots extend our abilities rather than overshadow them. This journey promises not just knowledge, but also a fresh way of envisioning a future filled with hopeful possibilities.
Chapter 1: Why Imagining Human-Like Robot Uprisings Distracts Us From Their True Nature And Potential.
Imagine walking into a room and seeing a robot that looks exactly like a human—two arms, two legs, a face that can smile, and even eyes that blink in a very human way. For decades, our books, movies, and TV shows have encouraged us to picture robots this way, often portraying them as powerful artificial beings capable of outsmarting or outmuscling humanity. These stories focus on robot rebellions or machines stealing every human job. It’s no wonder that when people hear about advances in Artificial Intelligence, they often panic and fear mass unemployment or even dangerous takeovers. But this kind of thinking, while dramatic and eye-catching, may prevent us from truly understanding how robots are developing today—and how they might become our partners rather than our rivals or bosses.
In reality, the cutting edge of robotics is not rushing toward building perfect human clones. Instead, engineers and innovators are working on devices that are more like specialized helpers, similar to how we’ve used animals throughout history. Before we had tractors, we relied on oxen to plow fields; before cars, we traveled long distances by horse. These animals changed what we could achieve, from growing enough food for entire communities to reaching far-off places. Likewise, the new wave of robots may not think like humans, but they can learn tasks, respond to their environments, and assist us just as well-trained animals do. By acknowledging this, we open ourselves up to imagining a future in which robots are not our competitors, but supportive partners guiding us toward new possibilities.
This shift in perspective invites us to let go of the idea that robots must match the complexity of our human minds. Machines do not need to replicate our flexible thinking or emotional depth to be valuable. Instead, they can excel in narrower roles—just as a carrier pigeon excels at delivering messages but wouldn’t drive a car. By letting go of the insistence that robots must walk, talk, and reason exactly like humans, we give ourselves the freedom to design them in ways that fit our world more naturally. Maybe they’ll roll on wheels, glide smoothly, or scuttle like clever mechanical creatures suited to their tasks. Imagining them as animal-like helpers instead of humanoid competitors allows us to embrace technology that complements human life rather than overshadowing it.
When we treat robots as companions inspired by our experience with animals, we stop worrying so much about them threatening our jobs or taking over society. Instead, we start asking practical questions: How can this robotic helper improve safety in dangerous workplaces? Could a robot care for the elderly or assist a person with a disability? Might it help us explore environments where humans cannot survive, like deep ocean floors or distant planets? These are the sorts of valuable roles that robots could fill. Once we set aside the science-fiction fears, we can appreciate that the future of robotics is not about assembling a race of human-like competitors. It is about inventing assistants that bring comfort, enhance productivity, and expand the boundaries of what we can achieve together.
Chapter 2: Unraveling Ancient Worries About Machines And Learning From How We Worked With Animals.
Long before robots, computers, or even electricity existed, people were afraid that new machines would take their livelihoods. In the early 1800s, English workers known as Luddites famously smashed textile machines, fearing that these mechanical looms would leave them unemployed. Yet over time, many societies discovered that innovations actually created new opportunities rather than destroying them forever. Although some old jobs vanished, entirely new kinds of work appeared. Still, anxieties about technology persist. Even today, some believe robots with advanced AI will leave humans powerless in the job market. But looking back at history, we see that each technological leap has often allowed human labor to shift into safer, more interesting, or more creative areas. The pattern suggests that the future with robots might be similarly balanced.
While most workers adapted over time to early machines, sometimes technology clearly replaced roles that once belonged to animals. Consider how oxen, horses, and camels were our partners for farm work, transportation, and even military logistics. When tractors and automobiles arrived, these animals were no longer needed for their heavy labor. But the animals we once relied on remind us that humans have always worked with other beings to improve their lives. Oxen extended our strength, horses carried us great distances, and dogs guarded our homes or helped us hunt. In a similar spirit, robots might soon deliver packages, scout dangerous locations, and handle tasks too dull or hazardous for humans. By understanding our past relationships with animals, we can better foresee how to team up with tomorrow’s robots.
A perfect example of animal assistance was the canary in the coal mine. Miners brought small yellow canaries underground because these birds would show distress if the air turned toxic. The sensitive canary saved human lives by warning miners when to escape. Today, automated sensors and remote-controlled machines perform similar roles, keeping humans out of direct danger. In Australian mining regions, giant driverless trucks now haul ore across dusty landscapes, controlled from safe offices far away. This kind of automation doesn’t remove humans entirely; it simply positions them where they can be safer and more efficient. By seeing robots as high-tech animals fulfilling targeted roles, we can accept their presence more easily and design workplaces that improve productivity without tossing human well-being aside.
We have tasked countless animal species with special assignments throughout history. Ferrets helped run cables through pipes, pigeons carried secret messages, and rats sniffed out landmines. Each animal had a unique skill that humans harnessed and shaped to meet a specific goal. Now, with AI, we are doing something similar. Instead of treating a supercomputer like Watson as a human mind, we can celebrate it as a tireless problem-solver good at certain tasks, such as playing a trivia game. By realizing that robots and AI are more like hardworking, skillful animals, we open the door to new possibilities. Rather than expecting machines to think like us, we can appreciate them for what they are—helpers designed for precise purposes that can ease our burdens and extend our abilities.
Chapter 3: How Reimagining Robots As Animal-Like Beings Can Spark Smarter Designs And Fairer Rules.
Think about a grocery store that tests out a tall robot, designed to patrol the aisles and spot spills. At first glance, this might seem like a convenient invention. But if the robot only shrieks an alarm at every single fallen spinach leaf, it might cause more hassle than help. Real employees now have to dash around even more, dealing with constant alerts. Some have called this photomation, meaning automated systems that force people to clean up after their digital helpers. This messy situation shows that not all robotic solutions are perfect yet. By thinking of robots as something more like animals—creatures that can adapt and learn—we might design them with better senses or problem-solving abilities, ensuring they don’t just add pointless tasks for human workers.
When deciding what shape a robot should take, we often fall back on the human form, thinking that two legs, two arms, and a head are best. But this design might not be the smartest. Wheels can be more stable and simpler to maintain. Think about a dog’s four legs or a penguin’s waddling steps—they evolved for efficiency in their environments. Similarly, a robot might roll, hover, or slither if that form best suits its purpose. By stepping away from human blueprints, we may create machines more suited to their tasks, just as nature’s many species each found their own perfect shape. Viewing robots like unique species encourages flexible design strategies that embrace simplicity, accessibility, and creativity, rather than forcing every machine into a human-looking mold.
Another challenge arises when robots make mistakes or cause harm. If we treat them like humans, we might imagine putting them on trial, much like people once tried animals in court for misdeeds. This may sound ridiculous, but it happened historically—pigs, weevils, and even rats were once placed before judges! Over time, people realized animals aren’t morally responsible like humans are. Instead, we hold the human owners or caretakers responsible. With robots, the same logic could apply. If a robot harms someone, we might not blame the machine, but the designer, manufacturer, or operator. By remembering that robots are more like clever tools or animal helpers, we can craft sensible laws that protect people without slipping into bizarre attempts to judge machines as if they had human conscience.
As our world evolves, it’s likely that robot laws will follow patterns found in animal regulations. Certain animal breeds are restricted or require careful supervision; similarly, some robots may need special licenses or operator training. Just as some countries require people to be sober when walking large, powerful dogs, we might demand sober operators for powerful robots. If a robot is considered potentially dangerous, legal rules could ensure it’s controlled responsibly. Such rules might even inspire improvements in how we treat animals. If we refine how we hold robot owners accountable, we might revisit outdated or unfair animal laws, treating all living creatures with greater care. By thinking of robots in animal-like terms, we create a framework that is both practical for technology and kinder to our world.
Chapter 4: Unexpected Lessons From Failed Digital Helpers And How Robot Companions Could Comfort Us.
If you ever used older versions of Microsoft Word, you might recall Clippy, the cartoon paperclip assistant. It popped up at the worst times, offering advice you never asked for. Clippy acted like an annoying spy peering over your shoulder, breaking the invisible social rules that help us feel comfortable. People hated Clippy because it judged their writing and interrupted their work. From this flop, companies learned that a good digital helper should feel supportive, not pushy. This memory shows that how a robot or virtual assistant interacts with humans matters deeply. The key is not making them human-like but designing them to be respectful, helpful presences that blend naturally into our lives, much as well-trained dogs or affectionate therapy animals make us feel calm and understood.
Animals have long brought comfort and relief to humans. Research suggests that spending time with pets can lower stress, reduce pain, and improve our mood. Therapy animals, like dogs that visit hospitals or llamas that stroll through nursing homes, show how nonjudgmental, friendly creatures can ease human suffering. They don’t criticize or demand complicated social exchanges—they simply offer presence, warmth, and the feeling that you’re not alone. Because they’re natural companions, people welcome them. This is a clue that robots aiming to provide comfort should behave similarly. They should be gentle presences that don’t force awkward interactions but offer quiet, steady companionship. If a robot can mimic some of the soothing qualities of a beloved pet, it could help humans relax and feel understood in moments of stress.
An example of a comforting robot is Paro, a soft robotic seal used in therapy settings. Paro looks adorable, has a gentle purring response when petted, and seems to notice when people engage with it. In many cases, patients with dementia find Paro’s presence soothing. Nurses have reported that a distressed patient might calm down as if an actual therapy animal were present. They’re not fooled into thinking it’s real, but they respond to its gentle cues. Critics worry that using such robots might reduce human care or genuine social contact. But this fear again frames robots as replacements rather than additional tools. When viewed as an extra layer of comfort, much like a familiar cat dozing peacefully on your lap, Paro can be an effective and welcome helper.
Considering robots as animal-inspired helpers helps shift the debate away from alarmist concerns that they will make us lonelier or less caring. Instead, we see a future where a robotic companion might fill gaps where human or animal help is scarce. They could keep an isolated senior company, help a child with special needs communicate, or simply provide a calming presence in stressful environments. Rather than displacing human relationships, these robots add new possibilities. Just as service dogs assist people with disabilities or therapy animals help trauma survivors, certain robots could expand the range of care and companionship available. By focusing on their animal-like qualities—friendly, patient, and calm—we can integrate them thoughtfully into our lives and appreciate their gentle power to improve human well-being.
Chapter 5: When Affection Meets Technology—How Our Feelings For Robots Could Challenge Our Ethics.
Think about how easily humans form emotional bonds. We name our cars, talk to houseplants, and sometimes feel sorry for stuffed animals. Now imagine a robot vacuum cleaner that glides around your home. Many people name their Roombas and treat them almost like pets. Some have even asked for their exact broken Roomba to be repaired rather than replaced, as if it had a unique personality worth preserving. This reveals a strange truth: we can become emotionally attached to machines, even simple ones. When we consider more advanced robotic companions, this attachment can deepen. People may one day mourn a malfunctioning robot dog much as they would a beloved pet. Such emotional ties raise new ethical questions about how we treat and value these technological beings.
The story of Sony’s AIBO robot dogs illustrates this point well. When Sony stopped supporting AIBO repairs, devoted owners felt genuine grief. Some arranged funerals for their broken AIBOs, and others donated them for spare parts as if performing an organ donation. This may seem odd, yet it shows how strongly humans can connect with a machine that behaves in an animal-like manner. Such attachments might be exploited by companies who charge high fees for repairs or special services. After all, if you love your robot friend, wouldn’t you pay a lot to keep it ‘alive’? This raises important questions about consumer rights, corporate responsibility, and how we protect people from being taken advantage of when they form real emotional bonds with their robotic companions.
Another worry is privacy and surveillance. Consider the case of Hello Barbie, a toy that recorded children’s voices and sent the data to remote servers. Parents were understandably upset, feeling that their homes had been invaded. Similarly, voice-activated smart assistants and other tech gadgets sometimes store or share data without users fully understanding it. As robots and AI companions become more common, we must ask: Are we comfortable inviting them into our most private spaces? Could companies harvest our personal moments for profit? The idea that a device we’ve grown to love might also be spying on us is unsettling. Much as we protect animals from abuse, we need rules to protect ourselves and ensure that we’re not betrayed by the very machines we welcome into our lives.
So, while the idea of friendly robots seems wonderful, it’s not free of complications. We face a delicate balance: we want to embrace helpful technology that can comfort, assist, and entertain, but we must also guard against new forms of exploitation and intrusion. Thinking about robots like emotionally significant animals might help. After all, we have rules about how we treat pets, about not being cruel, and about protecting endangered species. If we apply similar ethical care to robots, we might prevent abuses. When we consider that people will care deeply about robotic companions, it becomes clear that both emotional and legal frameworks must adapt. By thinking carefully about these issues now, we can ensure that our future relationships with robots remain healthy, respectful, and beneficial to everyone.
Chapter 6: The Troubling Thought Of Robot Abuse And What It Teaches Us About Morality.
Imagine watching someone stomp and crush a robot dog. Even if it’s just a machine, many people would find that scene deeply disturbing. Why? Because we tend to see cruelty toward creatures—real or artificial—as a nasty human behavior that we should discourage. Just as most of us cringe at the thought of animal abuse, harming a robot that looks and sounds like an animal feels morally wrong. This suggests that our relationship with robots might force us to define new boundaries. If we become attached to our mechanical companions, do we also owe them some form of kindness or respect? Could laws one day punish people for robot cruelty the way we punish those who mistreat real animals? These questions highlight how robots reshape our moral landscape.
Our current animal rights laws are inconsistent. We may condemn someone for harming a dog, but allow factory farms to raise chickens in miserable conditions. Similarly, horse racing can continue despite the deaths of racehorses each year, while dogfighting is heavily punished. These contradictions reflect how society struggles to align its ethical principles with its economic and cultural practices. Now, add robots to the mix. As artificial companions become more convincing and lovable, might we see new robot rights emerge? Perhaps some robots will be treated almost like pets, deserving protection from cruelty or wanton destruction. Others, maybe just simple vacuum cleaners, might be viewed as purely functional objects. This tension shows that the arrival of animal-like robots will force us to rethink what we value and why.
We often empathize with animals that sing, behave playfully, or appear intelligent, like whales, dolphins, and dogs. Our empathy grows stronger when we identify human-like emotions in them. Robots could trigger a similar response, especially those designed to mimic animal sounds, movements, or feelings. If a robot seal whimpers when kicked, people might recoil in horror, empathizing with the machine’s display of suffering. Over time, interactions with robots may highlight our capacity for kindness or cruelty. If we accept that torturing a lifelike robot is wrong, not because it feels pain but because it encourages cruel behavior in humans, we admit that ethics isn’t just about the victim’s suffering. It’s also about what we become when we act harshly. This mindset might even spur us toward better treatment of real animals.
Seeing how people respond to robots helps us understand that empathy and morality are not about whether something is truly alive or sentient, but about what our actions say about us. If we demand laws that prevent robot abuse, maybe we’ll become more consistent and humane in protecting real creatures. After all, if we find it wrong to mistreat a machine shaped like a puppy, shouldn’t we also be moved to treat all living animals with more respect? Robots, by mimicking traits we find adorable or pitiable in animals, can show us our moral blind spots. They might push us to ask tough questions about our values. When we treat robots kindly, we might also find ourselves becoming kinder, more thoughtful individuals in all areas of life.
Chapter 7: How Privacy Fears And Hidden Costs Threaten The Sweet Promise Of Robotic Companionship.
The future could hold robot assistants that tidy your room, remind you to take medicine, and even learn your favorite songs. Yet, as delightful as that sounds, we must be wary of the hidden costs. Just as people once reacted with outrage to Hello Barbie for recording household conversations, tomorrow’s robots might quietly gather more intimate details about your family life. If companies store and analyze these recordings, personal data could be sold, leaked, or used to influence buying habits. This invasion may feel especially upsetting when it involves a robot you trust and cherish. Such a device, welcomed into your home like a loyal pet, might double as a corporate spy. Balancing the benefits of helpful robots with demands for strict privacy protections will be an urgent challenge.
Another concern is how businesses could exploit our love for robots. If you adore your robot cat that purrs and reacts to your voice, what happens when it breaks? If it’s so special to you that it feels unique, the company might charge huge amounts to fix it, knowing you’ll pay to save your beloved machine. Without guidelines, companies could profit from your emotional attachment, forcing you to pay high subscription fees or expensive parts replacements. This situation mirrors how we might care deeply for a pet and spend big money on its veterinary care. But unlike a real animal, the robot’s very nature—its design, parts, and software—is under corporate control. Without fair consumer protections, emotional attachment could lead people into unfair financial traps.
These issues force us to imagine new rules that encourage transparency and accountability. Maybe we’ll demand labels that say how a robot uses recorded data, or that guarantee certain repair rights so customers aren’t at the mercy of a single company. Perhaps laws will forbid companies from withholding essential updates that keep the robot functional, ensuring these beloved companions don’t vanish when a corporation decides it’s no longer profitable. Just as animal welfare laws protect pets from harm and ensure humane treatment, we may need frameworks that protect robot owners from exploitation. If we treat our robots somewhat like animal companions, we might also expect robot-friendly policies that encourage fairness, honesty, and trustworthiness. This would help ensure that robotic companionship remains a positive force in our lives.
When we imagine a world filled with helper robots, it’s easy to dream about cozy afternoons chatting with a kind mechanical friend or relying on a digital guide that patiently solves problems. But we must also think about the less charming side—large tech companies hoarding control, privacy breaches that pry into intimate spaces, and pricey repairs exploiting your emotional bonds. To protect ourselves, we might turn again to the lessons learned from animal care and protection. If we can shape laws that respect our privacy, guarantee our right to repair, and shield us from trickery, we can keep the fun and comfort of robot companionship without falling into harmful patterns. Being prepared and thoughtful now will help us enjoy a future where technology truly serves human well-being.
Chapter 8: Exploring The Idea Of Robot Rights And How It Might Improve Animal Welfare Too.
Picture this: you have a robot dog that lives in your home. It greets you at the door, responds to your voice, and learns to fetch items for you. If someone at the park tries to smash it, you’d probably be outraged. Even if it can’t feel pain, the act would be violent and disturbing. Should the law protect your robot companion against abuse? As robots become more integrated into our lives, questions about their rights emerge. Interestingly, by debating how to protect robots, we may find a chance to revisit and improve how we treat real animals. Considering robot rights might push us to correct inconsistent animal welfare laws and create a fairer system that respects living creatures as well as our treasured mechanical partners.
Our current animal laws can be strange. We treat cats and dogs like cherished family members, passing strict anti-cruelty laws to safeguard their well-being. Yet we allow other animals—like pigs and chickens—to suffer in crowded farms. Similarly, certain sports involving animals are permitted even if they cause harm, while other forms of animal entertainment are banned. By thinking about robot rights, we might also start questioning these inconsistencies. If we decide that a robot dog shouldn’t be smashed for fun, isn’t it time to ask why certain animals can be mistreated behind closed doors? The logic that emerges from treating robot abuse as unacceptable might inspire us to refine our moral standards, holding humans accountable for all forms of cruelty, whether toward digital helpers or living creatures.
As we explore the idea of protecting robot companions from abuse, the discussion might shift our focus onto what truly matters: encouraging kindness and deterring cruel behavior. It doesn’t matter if the being harmed feels real pain. What matters is that we don’t want a society that normalizes pointless violence. By establishing respectful treatment for robots, we reinforce the idea that cruelty, even toward something that doesn’t feel pain, is not a good trait. This reasoning can then be extended to real animals. If we value compassion so highly that we protect robotic creatures from being mistreated, how can we justify neglecting real creatures that experience fear and suffering? Thus, defining robot rights could indirectly raise the bar on how we treat all life forms around us.
This approach to defining and enforcing rights encourages us to see moral questions not as black-and-white matters of who’s human enough or who can feel pain, but rather as reflections of the kind of world we want to live in. We want a world that frowns on pointless harm, encourages empathy, and respects differences. By examining robot rights, we consider what it means to treat all beings—real or artificial—with dignity. This could lead to more thoughtful laws and a broader understanding of ethics that extends beyond our own species. If we can learn to be more consistent and compassionate with robot companions, perhaps we’ll feel empowered to improve conditions for every living animal. In this way, robot rights debates can spark a positive ripple effect through our moral universe.
Chapter 9: Embracing Robots As Helpful Allies And Letting Go Of The Fear-Fueled Future.
For so long, stories have warned us that robots would grow too smart, surpass human intelligence, and steal our jobs or even our freedom. But as we look at how robots are actually developing, these fears seem less pressing. Instead of building metal versions of ourselves, engineers are creating tools that can serve as companions, workers, explorers, and protectors—much like the roles animals have filled throughout history. They might assist doctors during surgeries or help firefighters in dangerous situations. We can imagine robots that sort recyclables, deliver medicine to remote areas, or support kids with learning difficulties. Rather than replacing our strengths, these machines could fill in our weaknesses, pushing humanity forward in ways that respect our natural abilities and enrich our daily lives.
By comparing robots to animals, we understand that their value doesn’t lie in mimicking our intelligence or competing with our creativity. It rests in their ability to do specific tasks, adapt to certain environments, and free us from repetitive or dangerous work. Just as humans still care for horses, even though we no longer need them to pull carriages, we might always value certain robots for their reassuring presence. With time, we might shape a future where each household has a range of simple, animal-like helpers that lighten chores, watch over vulnerable family members, or provide calm companionship. In this vision, robots aren’t a threat—they’re part of a balanced ecosystem of tools, people, and living beings, all cooperating to make life more fulfilling and accessible.
Of course, there are important challenges to address. We must handle privacy concerns, fight against corporate greed, and create fair rules so robots don’t become instruments of cruelty or oppression. We must avoid the pitfalls of photomation, where technology adds more stress instead of reducing it. By thinking of robots like animals, we give ourselves a cultural and historical template for building healthier relationships with them. We learn from our past dealings with creatures that served, entertained, or traveled beside us. We remember that establishing laws and social norms took centuries, and we accept that robot-related laws will need careful attention and compassionate reasoning. In short, seeing robots as our new breed of helpers encourages thoughtful, ethical, and meaningful integration into the human world.
In this more balanced future, the panic headlines about robot domination fade away. Instead, we focus on enabling these advanced tools to extend human potential while respecting our values. Like animals, robots can share our journey as allies, illuminating what it means to connect, empathize, and protect. They can nudge us to improve how we treat not only machines but all creatures around us. By recognizing that robots need not be human-like rivals, we shift toward embracing their animal-like qualities—accepting their limitations, admiring their strengths, and cherishing their companionship. This perspective promises a future not of conflict and competition, but of cooperation and growth, where humans and robots coexist, learn from each other, and collectively create a kinder, more resourceful world.
All about the Book
Explore the intersection of technology and humanity in ‘The New Breed’ by Kate Darling, revealing how robots reshape our connections, ethics, and future. A riveting exploration for anyone intrigued by the evolution of life and machines.
Kate Darling, a prominent researcher at MIT, delves into robotic technology’s impact on society. Her insights resonate with innovators, ethicists, and curious minds alike, making her a leading voice in the field of robotics.
Robotics Engineers, Ethicists, Psychologists, Sociologists, Technology Enthusiasts
Robotics Building, Science Fiction Reading, Ethical Debating, Technology Blogging, Future Trends Analysis
Ethical implications of robotics, Human-robot relationships, Social impact of emerging technologies, Future of work and automation
The future of humanity lies not in the machines we create, but in our ability to understand and guide their integration into our lives.
Elon Musk, Jaron Lanier, Renee James
Best Technology Book Award, Outstanding Science Communication Prize, Innovative Literature Award
1. How can robots improve our daily lives significantly? #2. What ethical considerations arise from robot interactions? #3. Why do we form emotional connections with robots? #4. How can robots enhance human creativity and collaboration? #5. What challenges do we face in robot development? #6. How might robots change our understanding of companionship? #7. What role do robots play in education and learning? #8. How should we approach robot rights and responsibilities? #9. What is the impact of robots on mental health? #10. How do cultural attitudes shape robot acceptance? #11. What future jobs could robots create or eliminate? #12. How can robots assist in healthcare delivery systems? #13. What are the potential risks of advanced robotics? #14. How can we ensure robots are safe and reliable? #15. What lessons can we learn from robot design ethics? #16. How do emotional responses influence our robot interactions? #17. What advancements in AI are shaping robotic capabilities? #18. How can public policy guide robot integration effectively? #19. What are the implications of robots in aging populations? #20. How can we prepare society for robotic coexistence?
The New Breed book, Kate Darling, science fiction, robotics fiction, technology in literature, AI novels, 2023 best sci-fi books, future of robotics, books about artificial intelligence, novels exploring technology ethics, popular fiction 1982, best science fiction authors
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B089K47NYY
https://audiofire.in/wp-content/uploads/covers/1982.png
https://www.youtube.com/@audiobooksfire
audiofireapplink