Introduction
Summary of the book Why Are We Yelling? by Buster Benson. Before we start, let’s delve into a short overview of the book. Imagine walking into a room where people are talking excitedly, some disagreeing with each other, yet still smiling and listening. Wouldn’t that feel different from what we usually see? Most of the time, arguments make us feel uneasy. We’re told arguments are bad, that getting into disagreements means we’re doing something wrong. But what if we’re missing something important? Think about it: arguments can show us what matters deeply to us. They can bring attention to ideas we never considered. Instead of trying to avoid disagreements, we can learn to make them useful. By treating disagreements not as fierce battles but as ways to understand each other better, we open up new possibilities. We can learn to listen more closely, ask better questions, and gently handle the strong feelings that come along. With practice, we can turn arguments into friendly challenges that help us grow, learn, and become more understanding individuals.
Chapter 1: Embrace That Nervous Flutter: Understanding Why Arguments Often Feel So Uncomfortably Intense.
Have you ever felt your stomach twist when you realize you disagree with someone you care about, or even a stranger online? That fluttery, nervous feeling comes from our natural anxiety, which often rises the moment someone challenges what we believe or find important. When we sense a threat to our opinions, our heart races, our mind focuses narrowly, and we might struggle to stay calm. Since we’re usually taught from childhood that arguments mean trouble, it’s no wonder that we get nervous so quickly. But think about it differently: this nervousness isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It’s a signal that something meaningful is happening. Maybe we’re about to learn something new or see the world from another angle. By understanding that these anxious feelings are normal and not automatically negative, we start to see disagreements as opportunities rather than frightening conflicts.
When we argue, our bodies react as if we’re facing danger. Imagine if your friend said your favorite food is prepared the wrong way. A silly example, like slicing bagels in an odd direction, can still spark strong emotions. Why does something small, like a strangely cut bagel, make people so upset? Because it challenges our sense of what’s right and familiar. Anxiety wells up when our mental comfort zones are poked. If we don’t understand why we feel this way, we might quickly lash out or shut down. However, if we see that these jitters are just natural responses to unexpected viewpoints, we can calm ourselves. Instead of snapping or fleeing, we can say, I’m feeling anxious because this idea surprises me. Naming this feeling helps reduce its power and keep our minds open.
It helps to know that everyone experiences a swirl of feelings when confronted with a challenging idea. These feelings come from our personal backgrounds, our worries, and our experiences. For example, one person might feel anxious because they worry about safety issues, another might fear losing respect from friends, and yet another might fear that something cherished is being threatened. Each of these concerns can be summed up as different kinds of anxieties—some related to facts and logic, others to emotions and personal values, and some to practicality and usefulness. Understanding that everyone brings their unique brew of anxieties to a disagreement can ease tension. Instead of seeing the other person as crazy or stubborn, we can realize they’re just reacting to their own fears and uncertainties.
With this understanding, we start to accept that disagreement itself isn’t the enemy. Anxiety around disagreement is just a natural response to having our cherished viewpoints challenged. Instead of shutting down or fighting back blindly, we can embrace the uneasy feeling and explore it. Think of it like stepping into a slightly cold swimming pool. At first, it’s uncomfortable, but as you get used to the temperature, you can move around more freely. Similarly, by getting comfortable with the uneasiness of disagreement, we relax into the discussion. This shift in perspective sets us on a path where arguments become meaningful exchanges rather than terrifying clashes. Once we learn to tolerate and understand these anxious feelings, we begin to transform disagreements into valuable moments of deeper understanding and human connection.
Chapter 2: Peeking Under the Hood: Recognizing Different Types of Anxiety That Fuel Our Disagreements.
Anxiety in disagreements isn’t just one single feeling. It comes in different flavors. Imagine having three boxes inside your mind, each holding a different kind of worry. The first box, anxiety of the head, deals with logic and facts. When we feel uneasy because the other person’s information contradicts what we believe to be true, we experience head-based anxiety. The second box, anxiety of the heart, is about our emotions and personal values. This flares up when we feel our feelings or cherished moral principles are not respected. The third box, anxiety of the hands, is about practicality and usefulness—when we worry that the other person’s suggestion simply won’t work in the real world. By recognizing these three categories, we can start to understand why certain disagreements make us feel more rattled than others.
For example, picture a family debate about whether it’s okay to let a 12-year-old child stay home alone for the evening. One parent might argue from the heart: I don’t feel safe doing this because I deeply care about our child’s well-being and worry they might feel scared or lonely. That’s anxiety of the heart. The other parent might answer with a logic-based argument: It’s legal in our state for a 12-year-old to stay alone, so there’s no problem. That’s anxiety of the head, relying on facts and rules. These two parents are talking past each other. The first feels uneasy because of protective emotions, while the second tries to calm that unease with a factual statement. Understanding these differences lets us see why certain discussions never seem to move forward.
If we recognize that disagreements often involve clashing anxieties—heart versus head, or hands versus head, or any combination—we can respond more thoughtfully. Instead of pressing harder with logic when someone’s heart is hurting, we can acknowledge their feelings. Instead of insisting on emotional appeals when someone needs practical proof that an idea works, we can offer a realistic example. By adapting our responses to match the kind of anxiety the other person is feeling, we open a path toward calmer, more meaningful discussion. It’s like learning to speak different languages. If we only speak logic and the other person only speaks emotion, we’ll never fully understand each other. Learning to recognize these anxieties helps us find a common tongue.
In the end, knowing about these three types of anxiety allows us to bring more empathy into our interactions. Instead of getting frustrated, we can step back and say, Ah, this person is worried about something different than I am. This reduces confusion and anger. We stop seeing the other person as someone who’s just being difficult, and we start seeing them as someone who feels insecure, uncertain, or concerned, just in a different way than we are. Each type of anxiety deserves understanding and patience. When we realize that our disputes often come down to mismatched fears, we have a better chance of guiding the conversation toward understanding, respect, and potentially finding a path forward together.
Chapter 3: Hearing the Inner Chorus: Listening to the Many Voices Arguing Inside Your Own Mind.
When we argue, we tend to imagine that it’s just two people speaking. But in reality, inside your head, there might be multiple voices chiming in. Think of these voices like members of a quirky band, each with its own tune. One voice might be the voice of power, which wants to win at all costs and refuses to consider other viewpoints. Another voice might be the voice of reason, pushing you to rely on evidence, facts, and solid arguments. A third voice could be the voice of avoidance, whispering, Just walk away; this is too messy. And finally, there’s the voice of possibility, encouraging you to be curious, to ask questions, and to see disagreements as doorways to new understanding rather than traps.
Imagine a heated argument about something controversial like vaccinations. If you believe strongly in mandatory vaccines, your voice of power might say, They’re completely wrong, no question about it. Your voice of reason might demand, Show me credible evidence that vaccines harm anyone. Meanwhile, your voice of avoidance says, This is too stressful; let’s just ignore these people. But if you listen carefully, you’ll also hear the voice of possibility: Why do they feel this way? What brought them to this conclusion? By noticing these different inner voices, we can decide which one to follow. If we always pick the voice of power, we never learn anything new. If we rely only on the voice of avoidance, we never grow. The voice of possibility challenges us to stay open-minded and curious.
Choosing to listen to the voice of possibility doesn’t mean we must abandon our beliefs. It just means we remain open to the idea that others have reasons—logical, emotional, or practical—for believing what they do. Instead of slamming the door on conversation, we leave it ajar. We might still disagree, but at least we’ll know we tried to understand. Over time, using the voice of possibility can build bridges. People feel respected when you genuinely consider their views, even if you don’t accept them. It’s the difference between saying, You’re wrong and that’s final, and saying, I want to know why you think that, even though I disagree.
By practicing awareness of these internal voices, we gain control over how we respond in disagreements. We become like a conductor guiding our mental band. When the voice of power is too loud, we can gently turn down its volume. When we find ourselves avoiding tough topics, we can encourage the voice of possibility to speak up. This balance makes us more resilient in the face of conflict. Instead of feeling knocked around by arguments, we become steady, thoughtful, and harder to rattle. Just like a well-led orchestra creates beautiful harmony out of different instruments, a well-managed mind can create understanding, connection, and growth out of disagreements.
Chapter 4: Seeing the Invisible Filters: Identifying and Accepting the Biases That Shape Our Thinking.
We all have a special pair of invisible glasses that we wear when looking at the world. These glasses are our biases, the mental shortcuts and personal filters that help us decide what’s good, bad, right, or wrong. Biases can make life simpler, like when we know from experience that we like chocolate ice cream better than pistachio. Instead of testing every flavor every time, we rely on our past preferences. But biases can also blind us. They can limit our ability to understand perspectives different from our own. When we don’t realize we’re wearing these mental glasses, we assume we see the world as it truly is and that everyone who disagrees must be mistaken.
Two common biases are the availability heuristic and in-group favoritism. The availability heuristic means we prefer the first ideas that pop into our heads, even if they’re not the best options. For example, if you remember reading a scary news story about a rare event, you might believe that event happens all the time. In-group favoritism means we trust and support people we see as like us more than those who seem different. If someone is from our school, neighborhood, or political party, we give their opinions more weight. This makes us quick to dismiss outside voices without even considering them fairly.
Understanding that we have biases is crucial if we want to have better disagreements. We cannot just switch them off like a light. Instead, we must slow down and ask ourselves, Am I dismissing this idea just because it’s not from my group? or Am I ignoring other options because they don’t pop immediately into my mind? When we reflect on these questions, we become more aware of how our mental shortcuts are affecting our judgments. It’s like learning that the glasses we’re wearing have tinted lenses; once we know that, we can adjust how we see things.
By accepting that our biases exist, we grow kinder and more patient with ourselves and others. Instead of feeling frustrated because someone thinks differently, we realize that they are also wearing their own invisible glasses. We don’t have to agree with them, but recognizing that all people carry biases helps us stay calm, listen more closely, and consider new information carefully. It turns disagreements into chances to see the world through different lenses. In time, we learn that our biases can be managed, and that simply being aware of them makes us better at handling disagreements productively.
Chapter 5: Stop Reading Minds: Why Owning Your Perspective Beats Guessing Others’ Motives Every Time.
Have you ever been sure you knew why someone did something, only to find out you were totally off-base? During disagreements, a common mistake is to assume we understand the other person’s hidden motives. We might think, They’re acting like this because they’re lazy, or They must be selfish. But these guesses often oversimplify and misjudge the situation. We’re experts on our own thoughts and feelings, not on other people’s inner worlds. When we spend energy guessing and labeling others, we lose sight of what we truly know—our own experiences, values, and reasons.
Imagine a scenario involving two friends. One friend voted in an election, while the other didn’t vote at all. The voter might assume the non-voter is careless about the country’s future. However, when the voter actually asks, What made you decide not to vote? they might be surprised. Maybe the non-voter felt strongly that none of the candidates were worthy, and so abstaining was a form of protest. Understanding this doesn’t mean the voter must agree. But it does show that the non-voter wasn’t simply lazy or apathetic. By asking instead of guessing, we turn heated assumptions into clearer understanding.
Owning your perspective means focusing on expressing why you think what you think. If you believe a certain policy is good, explain your reasoning. If a decision frightens you, share why it’s scary. At the same time, give others a chance to speak for themselves. You don’t have to fill in the blanks of their motivation. Instead, you can say, I’m curious about your view. Could you tell me more? This approach not only reduces misunderstandings but also builds trust. It shows you genuinely care about what the other person thinks, instead of just assuming the worst.
In disagreements, the moment we stop trying to read minds is the moment true dialogue begins. By dropping our assumptions, we open up space for surprise and learning. It might turn out that the person’s reasoning is more complicated and understandable than we imagined. Even if we remain firmly on our own side of the fence, at least we’ll know we made an effort to listen. And who knows? Maybe understanding their thinking might even lead us to refine our own opinions, making them stronger, clearer, and more reliable. Most importantly, it allows both sides to feel seen and heard.
Chapter 6: Unlocking Communication Doors: How Asking Better Questions Transforms Arguments Into Explorations.
Questions can be powerful tools that either open locked doors or slam them shut. Too often, we use questions as if we’re playing a game of Battleship, trying to find and sink the other person’s ideas. We ask things like, Don’t you realize how wrong you are? or What’s your proof? hoping they’ll admit defeat. But this style of questioning turns conversations into competitions, where someone must lose. What if instead we used questions like keys that open up new rooms of understanding? Asking open-ended questions like, Why do you think this? or How did you come to this idea? invites others to explain themselves more fully.
Consider the difference between asking a friend who believes in ghosts, Where’s your hard evidence? versus asking, What experiences led you to believe in ghosts? The first question demands a certain kind of answer and might make your friend feel defensive. The second question is more like a curious invitation. Your friend can share their personal story, maybe about something strange they experienced as a child or a family tale passed down through generations. Even if you remain skeptical, you’ll understand their thinking better. In turn, they may appreciate that you took the time to listen rather than just trying to shoot down their view.
Better questions help disagreements feel less like fights. They shift the mood from I’m here to win to I’m here to learn. This doesn’t mean you can’t stand your ground. It just means you’re open to hearing more about where the other person is coming from. By doing this, you give them a chance to feel respected, which often makes them more willing to consider your viewpoint as well. When both sides feel heard, you’re more likely to move forward together rather than remain stuck in a loop of frustration.
Asking questions in this way turns arguments into a shared adventure rather than a hostile showdown. Think of it as exploring an unknown cave together. If you bark orders or say, Prove to me where the treasure is! you’ll only scare off your partner or create tension. But if you say, What do you see ahead in the darkness? they can tell you their impressions, and you can both move forward carefully. Over time, using good questions becomes second nature, making every disagreement more comfortable, enlightening, and less threatening.
Chapter 7: No More Easy Targets: Why Strong Debate Partners Make You Sharper and Wiser.
It’s tempting to pick on easy targets when we argue. We might look for someone whose reasoning seems obviously weak and then tear it apart to feel victorious. This is called nut picking—focusing on the silliest opponent to make our side look strong. But what do we gain by that, really? If we only challenge people who don’t push us to think more deeply, we remain stuck with our current level of understanding. We never spot the holes in our own reasoning or discover better ways to express ourselves. By choosing the weakest opponents, we’re like a sports team that only plays against children. Sure, we’ll win every time, but we’ll never improve our skills.
Imagine instead that you pick someone who is thoughtful, informed, and articulate, even if their viewpoint conflicts with yours. Engaging with them might be harder, but it’s like playing against a top-level player in your favorite video game. You might lose at first, but you’ll learn valuable lessons. They’ll point out flaws in your arguments you never noticed. They’ll offer perspectives that force you to rethink certain details. Even if you end up sticking to your original stance, you’ll come out stronger. By the time you face simpler challenges, you’ll be more confident and prepared.
This approach also encourages mutual respect. When we select better partners, we show that we’re serious about understanding the topic and not just interested in crushing someone. It’s a form of intellectual honesty. And it helps maintain friendly, respectful relations even with those who disagree. Over time, this can build a network of people who trust each other enough to engage in meaningful, high-level debates. Everyone involved becomes sharper, wiser, and more open-minded.
Think of it like learning a martial art. You don’t want to practice forever with someone who barely throws a punch. You want a sparring partner who challenges you, keeps you on your toes, and helps you refine your techniques. The same is true for disagreements. By seeking strong, credible opponents, we ensure that every argument is a chance to grow. Sure, it takes courage to face tougher opponents, but the reward is real personal improvement and a richer understanding of the world.
Chapter 8: Crafting the Perfect Stage: How Neutral Spaces Encourage Healthier Disagreements.
Where we disagree matters as much as how we disagree. Think about fighting with someone on a busy street corner, people rushing by, noise everywhere. Compare that to a quiet, comfortable living room with snacks and soft lighting. Which setting feels more supportive for a calm discussion? The spaces—physical or virtual—in which disagreements unfold can greatly influence whether people feel safe to share their real thoughts. If the environment feels hostile, people tend to put up barriers. If it feels neutral and welcoming, people are more likely to open up, listen, and engage honestly.
In a classroom discussion, there are usually rules, a respectful atmosphere, and a teacher to guide conversation. This structure can encourage more balanced exchanges. Online forums, by contrast, might lack clear rules or moderation. People can hide behind screen names, making them bolder, angrier, or less considerate. Though online discussions can be valuable, without a sense of fairness and safety, they often collapse into name-calling or silence. The trick is to create conditions—whether in person or online—where everyone feels at ease sharing viewpoints, even unpopular ones, without the fear of being ridiculed or ignored.
A neutral space isn’t just about physical comfort; it’s also about mental comfort. Setting guidelines, encouraging everyone to speak up politely, and recognizing different anxieties or emotions can help. No one should be forced to leave because their ideas are difficult to handle. No one should feel trapped, either. The best spaces allow people to join or leave without shame, set their own pace, and contribute in a way that feels natural. Even small gestures—like arranging chairs in a circle or using friendly tone markers like certain emojis—can make a big difference in how at ease people feel.
When spaces are shaped to support good dialogue, disagreements become more productive. It’s like preparing a garden bed before planting seeds. By creating the right conditions—good soil, proper watering, sunshine—the plants have a better chance to grow. Similarly, when we build environments that encourage respectful exchange and protect people from feeling attacked, we see more genuine conversation and more progress. In these spaces, disagreements stop feeling like doom-filled dramas and start feeling like shared journeys toward greater understanding.
Chapter 9: Facing the Unthinkable: Embracing Offensive Ideas Without Endorsing Them.
Some disagreements deal with mild topics, like which movie is best or what ice cream flavor rules. But other disagreements involve truly difficult and even offensive ideas—things that might feel dangerous, harmful, or downright disgusting. Our first instinct is usually to slam the door and refuse to talk about such things. We don’t want to spread these views, and we worry that giving them attention might legitimize them. The problem? Ignoring extreme ideas doesn’t make them vanish. If anything, shutting down conversation can make the people who hold these ideas feel even more certain and isolated, which might make their views grow stronger in hidden corners.
So how can we engage with harmful or repellent ideas without approving of them? We can think of it like safely handling a poisonous plant. We don’t eat it or admire it, but we examine it from a safe distance. We ask questions to understand why it grows and what conditions allow it to flourish. By doing this, we can learn how to uproot it, or at least prevent it from spreading. Interacting rationally with tough ideas means using our head, heart, and hands. We reason about where these ideas come from (head), we try to understand the fears and emotions behind them (heart), and we consider how knowing about them can be useful to our own understanding (hands).
Imagine someone who believes something truly alarming. If we just yell at them or block them out, we lose the chance to understand their thought process. Understanding doesn’t mean agreeing. It means seeing the world through their eyes, however briefly, so we can figure out how to address their anxieties, show them better information, or appeal to their sense of fairness or practicality. This open-eyed approach gives us tools to counter dangerous ideas more effectively than if we just stick our fingers in our ears.
By bravely facing offensive ideas, we learn how they survive and what fuels them. We might find that once we shine a light on these beliefs, they lose some of their power. People who hold them might soften when they feel heard, allowing for gradual change. Others might not change at all, but at least we’ll be well-prepared to stand firmly against their reasoning. Without this careful, thoughtful engagement, we remain stuck, and radical ideas persist in the dark. Shining light on them, questioning them, and understanding their roots gives us a better chance to move forward as a society.
Chapter 10: Building Bridges, Not Barriers: Turning Disagreement Into Opportunities for Growth and Understanding.
We often think of disagreements as walls that separate people. But what if we viewed them as bridges waiting to be built? Each disagreement can be a chance to expand our world. When we handle disagreements productively, we don’t just stand in place arguing; we move forward. We discover why others think differently and how that might influence our own understanding. Over time, this makes us wiser, more flexible, and more compassionate. Instead of dreading disagreements, we begin to see them as moments of possibility, where something new can be learned or understood.
Think about friendships or family relationships where you’ve argued and come out stronger afterward. Perhaps you and a friend always debate which movies are great. Even though you never fully agree, these disagreements are fun, and you learn more about storytelling, acting, and directing. On more serious topics, like politics or beliefs, productive disagreement can prevent anger from turning into hatred. By staying calm, asking good questions, and acknowledging anxieties and biases, we allow the conversation to become richer. Maybe we still disagree, but at least we now know each other’s reasoning and can respect the person behind the opinion.
Turning disagreements into growth opportunities also helps reduce stress and frustration in everyday life. Instead of feeling annoyed every time someone challenges you, you learn to approach it with curiosity. You gain more control over your reactions. Instead of feeling personally attacked, you remind yourself that different viewpoints are natural. This mindset helps you handle conflicts at school, at home, or even at a part-time job with more ease. As you become more skilled at productive disagreement, you’ll notice that the fear and nervousness around confrontation begins to fade.
Ultimately, seeing disagreements as growth opportunities makes the world feel bigger and more interesting. You don’t have to accept every argument or switch sides, but you learn that every debate brings knowledge. Even if the other person’s idea seems odd, you gain a better sense of what makes people tick. This is like collecting puzzle pieces. Each disagreement gives you pieces of the grand puzzle of human behavior, values, and beliefs. The more pieces you collect, the clearer the picture becomes and the more understanding you bring to all your interactions.
Chapter 11: From Fearful Fights to Curious Conversations: Embracing Disagreement as a Lifelong Skill.
Imagine a world where disagreements don’t always lead to anger or silence. Instead, they spark curiosity, creativity, and respect. This world can start with you, right now, by changing how you view and handle arguments. You’ve learned that disagreements spark anxiety because they threaten our comfort zones. You’ve seen that everyone has internal voices—some closing doors, some opening them. You’ve discovered biases that color your thinking and realized how important it is to ask questions that invite rather than attack. You’ve recognized the value of choosing strong opponents and creating neutral spaces. Even dealing with offensive ideas can become a process of careful understanding rather than blind rejection.
Practicing these skills won’t make disagreements vanish, but that’s not the goal. The goal is to improve how we handle them. Like learning any skill—playing guitar, speaking a new language, or mastering a sport—it takes time and patience. With each argument you face, try to remember your tools: acknowledge anxieties, identify biases, listen to the voice of possibility, ask open questions, and avoid guessing others’ motives. Slowly, you’ll notice it gets easier. You’ll feel less tension in your chest, less anger in your voice, and more interest in what the other person is saying.
In time, disagreements might even become something you welcome. They’ll no longer be dark clouds ruining your day, but chances to learn and strengthen connections. This doesn’t mean you have to agree with everyone. It just means you approach differences with a sense of balance and respect. Even when you must firmly stand your ground, you’ll do so thoughtfully, fully aware of your own reasoning and sensitive to the other person’s perspective. Instead of building unbreakable walls, you’ll be sketching out bridges, even if they remain unfinished.
As you continue using these approaches, you’ll contribute to a culture where disagreements aren’t nightmares. In your classroom, in your family, among your friends, and eventually in society at large, you’ll help pave the way toward better understanding. And if someone asks, Why are we always yelling? you can smile and explain that we don’t have to. We can learn, step by step, to turn arguments from scary shouting matches into respectful, meaningful, and inspiring conversations that help everyone grow.
All about the Book
Discover the art of effective communication in ‘Why Are We Yelling?’ by Buster Benson. This insightful guide helps readers navigate conflict and improve relationships through meaningful conversations. Elevate your dialogue and resolve disagreements with ease.
Buster Benson is a renowned author and communication expert dedicated to helping individuals understand conflict resolution and foster healthy discussions in both personal and professional settings.
Psychologists, Educators, Managers, Counselors, Social Workers
Meditation, Public Speaking, Debate, Writing, Conflict Resolution Workshops
Effective Communication, Conflict Resolution, Interpersonal Relationships, Emotional Intelligence
The goal is not to win the argument, but to understand each other.
Daniel Pink, Brené Brown, Adam Grant
Best Communication Book of the Year, National Bestseller, 2023 Readers’ Choice Award
1. How can conflicts become opportunities for growth? #2. What methods help transform arguments into discussions? #3. How do emotional triggers affect our conversations? #4. Why is listening crucial during heated debates? #5. What steps foster constructive rather than destructive dialogue? #6. How can we identify core beliefs causing disagreements? #7. What role does curiosity play in conflict resolution? #8. How do personal narratives shape our interactions? #9. Why is it important to question our own assumptions? #10. How can we approach disagreements with openness? #11. What strategies help manage anxiety during conflicts? #12. How does perspective-taking improve communication outcomes? #13. Why should we embrace uncertainty in discussions? #14. What techniques reduce defensiveness during arguments? #15. How can empathy transform adversarial encounters? #16. What habits cultivate resilience in difficult conversations? #17. How do we frame questions to ease tensions? #18. What methods help clarify misunderstood intentions? #19. How does self-awareness prevent escalating confrontations? #20. Why are diverse viewpoints valuable during debates?
communication skills, understanding arguments, effective listening, conflict resolution, emotional intelligence, debate and discussion, persuasion techniques, personal development, interpersonal relationships, self-help books, nonfiction books, Buster Benson
https://www.amazon.com/Why-Are-We-Yelling-Communication/dp/1541617976
https://audiofire.in/wp-content/uploads/covers/708.png
https://www.youtube.com/@audiobooksfire
audiofireapplink